The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is re-examining its refusal to compensate thousands of women affected by state pension age changes, but a simple two-word phrase could jeopardise potential payouts worth around £2,950 each.
The Crucial Phrase and the Campaigners' Vigilance
Following a damning report from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) in 2024, which found the DWP guilty of maladministration, the WASPI (Women Against State Pension Inequality) campaign has fought for redress. While the Labour government initially ruled out compensation, a new review is now underway.
DWP minister Pat McFadden has been ordered to "use his best endeavours" to make and announce a fresh decision within three months. WASPI campaign chair Angela Madden has highlighted the risk embedded in this legal phrasing.
"What 'best endeavours' means is should everything go as you planned, you will get it done," she explained, noting it creates "wiggle room" for a delay if a major event intervenes.
The campaign plans to allow a brief grace period after the late February/early March deadline. "If nothing is forthcoming, we would be speaking to our lawyers about what to do, to make this happen," Ms Madden stated.
Background of the State Pension Injustice
The long-running dispute centres on women born in the 1950s who were not adequately informed about increases to their state pension age. The PHSO investigation, conducted in stages, concluded in a final report published in March 2024.
It found the DWP failed to provide accurate, adequate and timely information about the changes, leaving many with little time to adjust their retirement plans. The Ombudsman also criticised the department's handling of the subsequent complaints.
What Happens Next?
All eyes are now on the DWP and Pat McFadden as the three-month deadline approaches. The outcome of this review will be critical for the affected women who have waited years for justice.
The use of "best endeavours" means campaigners must remain vigilant to ensure the process is not drawn out further. The potential for a positive decision offers a glimmer of hope, but the specific wording of the ministerial order has introduced a new element of uncertainty into the campaign.
