A public petition demanding the government scrap its plans for a national digital ID system has gathered massive public support, amassing almost three million signatures and forcing a formal debate in Parliament next year.
Petition Forces Government Response
The campaign, created by Maxim Sutcliff, calls on ministers to 'immediately commit' to abandoning any national digital ID scheme. It argues that the proposals represent a dangerous shift towards 'mass surveillance' and digital control, asserting that no UK resident should be forced to register with a state-controlled ID system.
This surge in signatures has officially triggered a parliamentary debate, which is now scheduled to be held on December 8, 2025.
Government's Stance and Proposed Rollout
In contrast to the petition's concerns, the Government is standing firm on its proposal. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has stated that the digital ID model will be 'fit for the needs of modern Britain'.
Officials plan to roll out the system to all UK citizens and legal residents before the next general election, which must occur by August 2029 at the latest. The digital ID would be stored securely on mobile phones, providing what the government calls an 'authoritative proof' of identity and residency status.
The Government's key arguments for the system include:
- Combating illegal migration.
- Simplifying access to government services.
- Reducing bureaucracy and fraud.
- Helping the estimated 1 in 10 UK adults who lack a physical photo ID.
Privacy, Security, and Public Consultation
In an effort to address privacy fears, the DSIT has emphasised that the digital ID will not be mandatory. It will not be a criminal offence to be without one, and police will not be able to demand it during a stop and search.
The government response also stressed that 'privacy and security will be central to the digital ID programme', with designs adhering to data protection law and high security standards to combat cyber threats.
A public consultation involving employers, trade unions, and civil society groups is promised in the coming weeks to help shape the final, more secure and inclusive design of the scheme before legislation is introduced.
