A planning inspector has upheld Solihull Council's decision to refuse permission for an outbuilding extension and access track at a Meriden property, leaving the homeowner facing potential enforcement action.
Andrew Cummings submitted a retrospective application for development at The Woodlands in Lodge Green Lane after building the extension in October 2023. Solihull Council's head of planning, Mark Andrews, refused the application in February, citing inappropriate green belt development.
Council cites harm to green belt
In his refusal, Andrews described the development as a "visually intrusive extension of urbanised development into agricultural land, resulting in an unacceptable erosion of the rural character and appearance of the area."
Inspector Philip Barton visited the site in May and acknowledged that the development was well-screened from public view. However, he dismissed the appeal, stating: "I have found that there would be harm to the green belt by reason of the proposal's inappropriateness and its effect on openness."
Inspector finds no special circumstances
The inspector concluded that "very special circumstances necessary to justify this development do not exist." This finding was central to the dismissal of the appeal, as it meant the development could not be justified under national planning policy for green belt land.
Councillor Bob Grinsell, chairman of Solihull Council's planning committee, had earlier warned developers at a June meeting. He said: "If you are going to build something, get permission."
Enforcement action looms
With the appeal now rejected, the homeowner faces potential enforcement action from Solihull Council. The council's planning department will determine the next steps, which could include requiring the removal of the unauthorised extension and access track.
The case highlights the council's strict approach to green belt development and the importance of obtaining planning permission before undertaking building work. The Woodlands property in Lodge Green Lane now remains subject to the council's enforcement powers.
