Mohammed Ammar, a 22-year-old from Walnut Mews, Weoley Castle, has been handed an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 18 months, after admitting his involvement in the supply of class B drugs. The sentence was passed at Birmingham Magistrates' Court on Tuesday, August 4, following his guilty plea to being concerned in the supply of cannabis between January and April last year.
Ammar came to police attention on April 1 when rail staff at Selly Oak station found him without a valid ticket. He refused to provide his details, prompting officers to be called. A search revealed he was carrying 16g of cannabis, £16.13 in cash, and two mobile phones. A subsequent search of his home uncovered a further 51g of the drug, along with dealer bags, digital scales, and a cannabis grinder.
Court hears of 'significant role' in dealing
Prosecutor Ms Begum told the court that officers detected a strong smell of cannabis and that Ammar admitted to having smoked two hours earlier. Mobile phone messages showed discussions of potential availability, indicating his involvement in the supply chain. The court heard that Ammar played a "significant role" in the dealing operation and had one previous conviction for a single offence.
In mitigation, Mr Winstance said: "This is a man who primarily, not entirely, was dealing to fund his own habit. I accept that it goes beyond that and I accept the categorisation my friend put upon it. You will want a report, you are looking at a convicted young man. He has never been to jail."
Suspended sentence and additional requirements
As part of the sentence, Ammar must complete 20 days of rehabilitation activity requirements. He is also required to pay £85 in prosecution costs and an £87 victim surcharge. The suspended sentence means he will not serve the prison time unless he commits another offence within the 18-month period.
The case highlights the consequences of drug-related offending in Birmingham, with the courts taking a firm stance on those involved in the supply of illegal substances. Ammar's cooperation with the legal process and his admission of guilt were factors considered in the sentencing.
