A Shropshire family is battling what they call an "unfair" decision by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) to withdraw a man's vital disability benefits, a move triggered by a video of him playing in a community cricket match.
'Stress and worry' over £36,000 repayment demand
Shaun and Lauren Rigby from Shropshire say the DWP's ruling to strip his Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and demand the repayment of £36,000 is causing the family immense distress. The decision came after a video emerged showing Shaun, 37, who lost his leg below the knee as a toddler, participating in a casual game of cricket.
His wife, Lauren, voiced the family's anxiety, stating that losing the PIP payments was difficult enough, but the prospect of repaying such a large sum is overwhelming. "Do they want us to go into poverty?" she asked the BBC. The family insists the match was a light-hearted community event and that Shaun has not played regularly since around 2014 as his body began "breaking down."
DWP and tribunal uphold controversial decision
The DWP has defended its action, stating that its decision was supported by an independent tribunal following an appeal by Mr Rigby. A DWP spokesperson explained that PIP is awarded based on how a condition affects daily living and mobility needs, not the condition itself. They emphasised that every claim is assessed on individual circumstances, including a person's ability to manage their condition without help.
However, the Rigby family strongly contests this assessment. They argue that Shaun's participation in adaptive sports like cricket is a form of rehabilitation and crucial for his psychological well-being. "Playing cricket does not negate Shaun's disability; it showcases his determination to lead a fulfilling life despite it," they said.
A life of determination after childhood tragedy
The family detailed how Shaun has overcome incredible odds since losing his leg in a tragic tractor accident at just two years old. They describe a man who has strived to "live as fully as possible," engaging in activities for his mental and physical health and to create joyful memories with his family.
This case highlights the ongoing tension between the DWP's assessment criteria for disability benefits and the reality of life for many disabled people who use sport and activity as a means of coping and thriving. The Riggys' fight underscores broader concerns about how evidence of living a full life can be misinterpreted in PIP assessments.
