The Personal Independence Payment points-based system should be overhauled because it is "worthless" for certain conditions, the Timms Review is set to find. The review, co-chaired by Labour cabinet member Sir Stephen Timms, will file its interim report this week, concluding that PIP is "not fit for purpose" and the entire assessment system must undergo root-and-branch reform.
Current PIP Points System Deemed Inadequate
As it stands, PIP uses a points system to determine eligibility. Points are based on descriptors that best describe a claimant's condition. A descriptor applies if it reflects the claimant's ability for the majority of days—over half—over a 12-month period, looking back 3 months and forward 9 months. Where one descriptor is satisfied on over half the days, that descriptor applies. If two or more are satisfied, the descriptor with the highest points applies. PIP does not separate day-time and night-time needs; instead, a descriptor applies if the condition affects the ability to complete a task at some stage of the day on over half the days.
Fluctuating Conditions Exposed as Weakness
The Timms Review will echo warnings from campaigners that parts of the system, originally intended to capture learning disabilities, now cover some mental health conditions where the ability to do an activity varies from day to day. For such fluctuating conditions, the points-based assessment is practically worthless, the report will reportedly find.
Impact on 4 Million Claimants
The review, which affects 4 million PIP claimants, is expected to propose a complete overhaul of the assessment process. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has yet to comment on the findings. The shake-up could lead to significant changes in how eligibility is determined, particularly for those with conditions that vary in severity.
