Planners in the West Midlands have delivered a definitive 'no' to a renewed application seeking to establish a children's care home in a residential Olton street, following substantial community pushback.
Second Application Fails After Committee Rejection
The proposal, which aimed to convert a property on Dene Court Road into a small residential home for up to two children, has been rejected for a second time. This latest decision comes after Solihull Council's planning committee originally refused a similar scheme last month, citing concerns over amenity and highway safety that contravened local planning policies.
Applicant Aqib Nawaz initially submitted plans last September for a home catering to children aged between 11 and 17 years old. Following the committee's refusal, Mr Nawaz pursued an alternative route in December by applying for a certificate of lawful development, arguing the change of use would not materially alter the character of the dwelling.
Substantial Local Opposition Mounts
The application attracted considerable local opposition, culminating in a petition bearing 60 signatures being formally submitted to Solihull Council. Residents voiced strong objections to the proposed change of use in their neighbourhood.
A planning statement submitted with the December application contended that the proposed use would not differ in character from a standard domestic dwelling. It outlined that the home would be run by a professional provider, registered and regulated by Ofsted, with qualified staff providing care on a rotational shift basis for children aged eight to 17.
"The proposed use would not result in a definable change in the character of the use from what has gone on previously," the statement asserted, arguing that a certificate of lawfulness should therefore be issued.
Council Officer Upholds Refusal
However, on February 6, Mark Andrews, the council's Head of Planning, Design and Engagement Services, issued a decision notice refusing the certificate. After reviewing all submitted information, including cover letters and floor plan layouts, Mr Andrews concluded the proposed change of use did not constitute permitted development.
This final refusal underscores the council's stance on maintaining planning policy adherence and responding to significant community concerns regarding development in residential areas.
