Plans to construct six bungalows on an agricultural field in a Worcestershire village have been met with significant opposition from local residents and parish authorities, who have branded the site 'inappropriate'.
Proposal for Rural Field Draws Criticism
An application has been formally submitted to Wychavon District Council seeking permission to develop a piece of agricultural land situated behind 7 Top Street in the village of Charlton, which lies between Pershore and Evesham. The proposal, for a half-dozen bungalows, is positioned on the village outskirts on land currently used for farming.
Documents supporting the application argue that the scheme would help address the council's identified shortfall in housing land. They state that the location and scale of development would offer a high standard of accommodation with suitable outdoor space, and that dwellings could be comfortably situated without adversely impacting neighbours.
Residents Voice Fears Over Traffic and Access
However, Charlton Parish Council has formally objected, stating the site is in 'open countryside where sustainable travel choices are limited'. The authority warned that future residents would be highly reliant on private cars and raised serious concerns about construction and everyday access via a 'narrow dirt track'.
Local resident Mark Haslam argued the plan does not maintain or enhance the rural community but instead 'removes valuable green space' in a village known for agriculture and equine activities. He also questioned the suitability of the hilly site for bungalows, which are typically designed for level access.
Steve Eggleston acknowledged the need for new housing but said it should not 'ride roughshod over the basics of good planning'. He highlighted that Top Street is essentially a single-track road, and any new access would increase risks. He also claimed Charlton is becoming a 'rat run' for traffic heading from Evesham's Hampton area to the A44.
Sustainability and Community Impact at Heart of Dispute
Another resident, Jane Walters, echoed traffic concerns, stating Top Street cannot handle increased volume. She dismissed the application as inappropriate and not the 'windfall opportunity' it is being presented as.
The collective objections centre on core issues of sustainable development, preservation of rural character, and practical infrastructure. The decision now rests with Wychavon District Council's planning committee, which must balance the claimed housing land supply benefits against the significant local concerns regarding the site's suitability.
