Afghan Nationals Accused of Schoolgirl Rape Show 'Revolting' Trial Conduct
Two Afghan nationals standing trial for the alleged rape of a schoolgirl have demonstrated what prosecutors describe as a "revolting" and "stomach-churning" approach to the evidence presented against them. The case, being heard at Warwick Crown Court, involves serious allegations concerning a 12-year-old girl from Nuneaton, Warwickshire.
Prosecution's Closing Arguments Highlight Disturbing Defence Claims
During his closing speech to the jury, prosecutor Daniel Oscroft outlined what he characterised as the defendants' deeply concerning responses to the allegations. Ahmad Mulakhil, aged 23, and Mohammad Kabir, aged 24, are both accused of targeting the young girl after spotting her in a local park in July of last year.
Mr Oscroft told the court that Mulakhil had shown "no hint in the evidence he gave of any pause for reflection or to consider that in retrospect he made a mistake." The prosecutor emphasised that the defendant was instead blaming the victim for what occurred.
Defendant's Controversial Claims About Victim's Age and Consent
Mulakhil has admitted to one count of oral rape but denies two further counts of rape, two counts of sexual assault, child abduction, and taking an indecent video of a child. In his defence, he claimed the girl had insisted he film part of their sexual activity, a suggestion the prosecutor described as "slightly revolting."
The defendant has also attempted to argue that he believed the victim was an adult, initially stating she was 20 or 22 years old, despite video evidence showing she told him she was 19. "They knew, both of them, they were dealing with a child," Mr Oscroft asserted to the jury of seven men and five women.
Defence Counsel Presents Alternative Perspective on Age Belief
Marcus Harry, representing Mulakhil, invited the jury to consider whether his client genuinely believed the girl was 16 or older. "If you think it is possible that he believed she was 16 or over then he cannot be guilty of (child) abduction," he argued, acknowledging that jurors might agree the victim was obviously under 16.
Fellow defendant Mohammad Kabir denies charges of intentional strangulation, committing an offence with intent to commit a sexual offence, and attempting to take a child. The prosecution maintains that both men are guilty on all counts they face.
Jury Expected to Begin Deliberations
The jury is expected to retire to consider their verdicts in this disturbing case on Friday. The trial has highlighted challenging questions about consent, age perception, and responsibility in sexual offence cases involving minors.
This case continues to develop at Warwick Crown Court, with significant implications for how similar allegations might be prosecuted in future. The community awaits the jury's decision following what has been described as a particularly distressing trial process.
