Former Midlands NHS Gynaecologist at Centre of Police Probe Dies
Daniel Hay, a retired Midlands NHS gynaecologist who was under police investigation over allegations he performed medical procedures without patient consent, has died. Derbyshire Constabulary confirmed his death on Wednesday, April 15, stating he passed away in hospital from natural causes.
Investigation into Alleged Non-Consensual Procedures
The police inquiry focused on claims that Hay carried out procedures without the consent of a number of women during his tenure. Detectives have contacted all individuals involved in the investigation and are now reviewing how this development will impact the case moving forward. The force has pledged to maintain communication with those affected.
Hundreds of women were under Hay's care while he worked for the University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust (UHDB). He retired on health grounds in 2020 and had reportedly stopped clinical work in 2018.
Report Reveals Shortcuts and Patient Harm
A report published in October 2025, commissioned by the Gynaecology Review Steering Group, examined the care provided by Hay between 2015 and 2018. It found that he took shortcuts in clinical assessments and demonstrated an increasing willingness to take risks.
The report concluded that two patients suffered severe physical harm, and the mental health of many others was adversely affected by his practice. It also noted that further harm was prevented only by the support of colleagues and good fortune.
Key findings from the report include:
- Hay's care fell far below expected standards.
- Recommendations were made to UHDB, including that consultants should not work in isolation at clinics.
- The trust issued its deepest apologies to the women affected.
The steering group included representations from NHS England, UHDB, and the Derby and Derbyshire Clinical Commissioning Group. Following the report's publication, UHDB expressed regret for the substandard care provided under Hay's supervision.
As the police continue to assess the investigation's next steps, the case highlights ongoing concerns about patient safety and consent within medical practices.
